It’s a beautiful desk, built of fine hardwoods and a contemporary design that makes it a perfect fit for a den, home office or workplace. But even more compelling, its sophisticated design hides ugly tangles of wires and cables caused by all the wireless routers, monitors and workstations that crowd a typical workspace. So Goldstein Group was hired by Caretta to create a new brand for the young furniture manufacturer as it moved from development to full-scale production. With new messaging, literature, a series of PR announcements and a re-imagined web presence, Caretta traffic doubled every month during the first four months following the company’s brand launch. Strong PR announcements and aggressive search engine marketing drove ever-higher web visits with metrics that showed visitors remained on the site for remarkably long periods.
Archive for September, 2010
Search Tools and PR Drive Furniture Site Traffic
Monday, September 27th, 2010Addressing The Nine Breakpoints in Lead Flow
Tuesday, September 21st, 2010Internet marketers often speak about processes being “frictionless,” of an ideal situation where sales are created quickly, smoothly and with none of the barriers traditionally facing marketers.
That’s certainly the ideal situation, one we all seek to achieve. Yet, we know from practical experience that it’s difficult to achieve, particularly in sales lead funnel management. In fact, lead flow for business-to-business companies is anything but frictionless today.
Consider the attached graphic that shows the steps for a typical multi-million manufacturer. It generates thousands of leads, sells through a direct sales force, and uses the traditional inside-outside sales support infrastructure where inside sales personnel qualify and support an outside sales team that pursues the highest quality leads. Very common and routine, yet you can see from the complexity of the chart that there are many steps a lead must pass through on its way from creation to close.
Every company contains a different chart. Whether yours matches what you see here is unimportant; what is important is that the process is involves multiple departments, multiple people and multiple steps, and making it perform efficiently must begin with someone actually plotting out the process to capture what actually takes place.
But now the hard work begins. How do you IMPROVE the process? How do you reduce complexity, cut the number of steps, improve the speed of lead flow and improve the communications that takes place (or doesn’t take place!)?
Our agency has identified nine common “breakpoints” that occur in most companies in some form in the lead chain. Improvement can’t begin until the process is documented, then diagnosed by uncovering the breakpoints common to your company. You may have all nine (unlikely) or a subset of the nine we’ve seen. You may have others not identified here. But the improvement process begins with identification, then understanding, then resolution of each breakpoint affecting your company.
Here is a summary of the nine breakpoints most common in lead generation today:
- Lead Flow. Do you have enough quality leads flowing through the system? Pretty basic, but you can’t achieve your company’s sales goals if you don’t know how many leads must enter the funnel. In other words, if your average sale is $10,000, your monthly sales target is $100,000, and you close one out of every 10 opportunities, your sales funnel has to generate 100 quality leads monthly in order to meet your sales projections. Conversely, it’s possible to have too many leads in the funnel, in situations where you don’t have enough staff to process/qualify them, or enough budget to allocate to lead processing (yes, there is a cost for handling every lead!).
- CRM/Technology. Customer Relationship Management software should provide a platform to answer all your questions about leads, and to eliminate friction from the process. We all know, however, that too many CRM installations fail, or that most companies don’t really use or absorb the technology in ways that help the sales process. CRM technology should be used to eliminate many of the breakpoints we’ll identify here. Hiring more people, generating more leads, accepting breakdowns in communications, are all unnecessary afflictions of the process that good CRM implementation can solve.
- Lead Quality/Lead Scoring. It’s important to understand what your close rate is (10%, 25%, etc.), and how to apply that to various people, product lines and divisions. Close rate is a magic number that diagnoses many types of breakpoints in the sales process. If different salespeople have different close rates, it points to training or perhaps territory issues. If close rates deteriorate over time, it points to problems with leads being generated that are low quality, or a change in the market taking place (a competitor’s new offering or lower price). If your funnel isn’t working well, it could be that the leads you’re entering into the system at the top are of low quality. Every lead needs to be “scored” as A, B or C quality in terms of its relationship to your sweet spot, your target: these are leads that close the fastest, have the highest profit margins and generate the most repeat business and referrals.
- Role Confusion. For organizations that have inside-outside sales teams, it must be clear what lead is sent to the high-priority outside salesperson (A leads), what leads require additional qualification/processing (B leads) and what leads should be sent just to the database and are too low quality (yet still relevant) today but may bubble up to B or A quality later. Some organizations send all leads to the field, which is typically a process that is inefficient and burns out a sales force. However your company does it, the process needs to be defined.
- Leads Sent to the Right Place. For organizations with distributors or outside sales reps, what leads go to these outside resources, and when? If you sell a complex product, you may not be able to send leads out to an independent rep until they’ve been further qualified. Or, your organization may rely on the reps to fulfill that task. Every process is different, requiring thought given to the question of just which team handles which leads at what point.
- Links to Outside Reps/Distributors. Whether it’s a dedicated online portal or some other method for tracking leads, it’s important to incorporate lead follow-up with any outside resources that receive leads in your funnel process.
- Feedback Link. You’ll want to build in a feedback loop into your lead process, likely through your CRM/technology system, to track quotes and opportunities. This type of data is important not only for ensuring that no opportunities are lost, but to improve the overall process and lead quality you’re generating.
- Separate Databases. Most companies maintain a lead and prospect database, often controlled by marketing or sales, and also a separate database for customers. These twin silos of unconnected data prevent marketing organizations from selling to existing customers (the lowest of the low-hanging fruit), generating referrals, and gaining insight into who becomes a customer and why. Combining the prospect and customer database is a simple tactic for creating powerful leverage that translates into immediate revenue and insight.
- Analysis/Metrics. Simply put, marketing is math. Everything about sales and marketing can be converted to numbers, analytics and measurement, and nothing can be improved until activities are converted into numbers. Diagnosing problems, improving the system, generating more quotes and conversions, reducing cost/lead – all these basic tasks we face as managers of sales and marketing can’t begin to be solved without understanding in numerical terms what’s taking place, and what can be done to remove the barriers that analytics reveal exist.
The Five Factors Needed for Sales Conversions
Wednesday, September 15th, 2010There’s a difference between lead generation and lead conversions. And while many sales and marketing organizations focus on the funnel and lead flow, what they’re really after, particularly for business-to-business companies, is the conversion. So how do we measure and improve the rate of lead-to-opportunity conversion?
According to a study by SiriusDecisions, 52% of B2B marketers say lead generation is their #1 problem. As an agency specializing in both online and traditional lead generation campaigns, that’s nice to hear.
But when you listen to them, they’re actually struggling something entirely different. Almost without exception, when you talk to marketing VPs about what they’re really trying to solve, it has nothing to do with generating more leads or even improving the quality of the leads they generate:
- “I don’t know what happens to the leads I give the sales force.”
- “I can’t tell what sources generate the best quality leads.”
- “My salespeople/my channel don’t follow up on the leads I give them.”
- “My salespeople want all the leads in their territories, but there’s really too many for them to pursue.”
- “My CRM system doesn’t work.”
- “My conversion rates of leads to opportunities is inconsistent/too low.”
When we meet with sales and marketing VPs at companies both large and small, they are plagued with sales and marketing integration issues. More than anything, sales process issues, and the handoff of leads from marketing to sales, are the paramount challenges B2B companies face today, and the recession has only exacerbated that problem. It’s not that we don’t have enough leads; in truth, we’re just not doing a good job of finding the diamonds in the rough, converting them to opportunities, managing the process, and tracking the results, so we know what works and what doesn’t. Seems simple. And some of us even admit it, according to the SiriusDecisions report, where 10% of marketers did in fact admit that “sales process issues” were their #1 concern.
This is hard work, which is why so few companies really solve it. It’s not a question of lead flow, or technology, talent, personalities or boundary issues between sales and marketing. It’s all of the above.
When we consider the barriers to proper lead conversion-to-opportunity, there actually are five factors we see in organizations today that prevent true conversion from working effectively.
- Lead flow. This is where most organizations start (and unfortunately end!), and it’s certainly the core component of lead generation. Your funnel has to be large enough to support your sales goals, and it has to be adequately focused so that they’re generating opportunities within your sweet spot. Last, your process has to be mapped out in detail, to identify any breakpoints in the process. In fact, we’ve identified nine common breakpoints present at many companies, such as lack of lead quality scoring to incorrect decisions that call for handing off all leads, before pre-qualification, to the sales force.
- Technology. Companies with even a relatively small lead flow of a few hundred a year quickly become swamped in their ability to track, pursue and sustain leads over time. That’s certainly the case if you’re generating thousands of leads annually. Simply put, leads are like money in the bank, and they must be cared for and nurtured over time. How many quotes closed last month, and what industry segments closed fastest? How will you keep in touch – affordably – with B and C quality leads over time as their needs evolve to A quality opportunities? What salespeople or sales reps need help in closing, with opportunities being left on the table? Those are all questions that Customer Relationship Management (CRM) technology can answer. This is an era when ROI for marketing is critical, and no lead generation program can function and improve over time without the analytics to measure it, and the technology to manage it.
- Sales Training. We’re at the point when most companies stop their pursuit of lead management improvement with the above two factors – generate more leads, and buy a CRM program. All problems will disappear, correct? Not likely. Your sales force requires constant training, teaching and skills development on the latest industry factors, the customers most likely to buy, the newest products you’re delivering. Particularly for remote salespeople, for independent sales reps or agents, investments in sales training are critically important in improving their ability to generate and close opportunities.
- Proper Roles/Handoffs. When is a lead turned over to the sales force? When does a lead go to the inside team versus the field salesperson? The roles and handoff protocols are different for every sales organization, and they must be defined with clarity as part of the lead tracking process. Best practices in most organizations call for only sending A quality leads out to the field, thought that’s not universal. And, in the absence of the inside-outside sales structure, it’s important to think through how leads will be handled so you don’t distract your sales team from pursuing true opportunities, as opposed to wasting time pursuing low quality contacts. However you define handoffs in your organization, it’s important that they be defined.
- Shared Commitment. The elephant in the room: separate leaders for the sales and marketing teams who don’t see eye-to-eye. The fact is, none of the above will work correctly if the people who lead sales and marketing organizations don’t work together with the same, shared vision for efficient lead flow. If the marketing leader installs a CRM that is ignored by the sales team, the results are predictably non-existent. If the sales team pursues a market segment with no training, leads or targeted sales materials, closing those opportunities will take far longer and cost far more. Both organizations, if they are separate, must approach lead and opportunity management from the same perspective, with the same commitment, and the same passion.
Bring Back the Good Editors
Wednesday, September 8th, 2010Anyone wishing for 2008 to return? For most companies, 2008 was a year of strong performance, and many of us are anxious for those marketing patterns and programs to return.
But they won’t. The financial collapse and global recession hasn’t been just a momentary pause in the way we do business – it’s led to a significant change in how companies operate. It’s certainly led to a change in how they go to market. The way we built marketing campaigns for business-to-business companies has changed structurally and permanently. Things will not get “back to normal.”
In response, it’s common for companies to migrate much if not all of their marketing spend to an online-only world. While we agree with the importance of the web and online marketing, we think an online-only approach is a mistake. Companies need a balanced program, and the role of print in branding is still important.
In fact, we’ve been talking with clients about how much of the move toward online, in particular toward “user-generated” content, is actually revealing a need for filtered content that only a good editor can provide. Here’s what we mean.
What is the engineer’s most precious commodity? I think we can all agree that it’s time. In light of that, engineers must turn to sources of information that will tell them what they need to know to do their jobs better, and to do so while consuming as little time as possible.
So while it’s great to rely on search and participate in user-driven forums, I think we all can also agree that much of what we find user forums, blog comments and other social media outlets is, politely, noise that’s not really worth our time. Engineers are coming to the conclusion that what they need is an answer to a question now, and they don’t have time to sort through noise to find it.
So the job of a magazine editor is once again becoming more critical. Magazine editors are trained to sift, evaluate and organize. A good editor can determine what’s critical for a reader to know, and present it in ways that are accessible, clear and convenient. It doesn’t matter whether it’s online, in print, face-to-face, and perhaps even in new user-generated forums that have some editing filter in front of it.
I believe that explains why some magazines have survived, such as Microwave Journal, and some have fallen by the wayside. Magazines in tune with their audience make good use of their readers’ time. It’s not an easy task, but as we all struggle with exploding levels of information overload, it’s a critical task that will become more central to how the engineer learns and finds information.

