| |
December 15th, 2010 by Joel Goldstein
Steady budgeting and a priority on lead quality over quantity highlight the results of this year’s Marketing Budget Trends white paper, an annual study of business-to-business marketing trends conducted jointly by Goldstein Group Communications and Hearst Business Media.
Those are two of the trends identified in the study, conducted during November, 2010. Survey authors said the survey respondents pointed to fewer dramatic changes in their approach, and more to 2011 activities that seek to take advantage of the changes put in place during the recent economic upheaval.
“The past few years have seen once-in-a-career shifts brought on by the global economic collapse and the emergence of new tools such as social media,” said GGC President Joel Goldstein. “So it’s not surprising that prior surveys reflected rather significant changes in marketing against this backdrop of uncertainty and new media. Now, though, based on opinions from those who responded, 2011 may just be a year of steadied progress rather than wholesale re-configuration of marketing. From steadier budgets to more uniform responses to questions about future initiatives, marketers seem to be in a mood to implement recent decisions rather than searching for new answers.”
Survey highlights included a variety of key trends for 2011 marketers:
- B-to-b marketers expect consistency or improvements in budgets for 2011. When asked how spending would change next year, 44% reported no change to budgets, a full 11 points higher than a year ago. Continued recovery is still forecast by many, with 27% projecting an increase and just 6% pointing to budget decreases.
- The ratio of online-to-traditional spending settled in at 51% traditional to 49% online; two years ago, 60% of budgets were spent on traditional tactics such as literature/catalogs, direct mail, trade shows, print advertising, etc.
- Web development, online advertising and search engine marketing will consume 38% of budgets in 2011 and are the clear priority of decision-makers as they’re crafting spending plans for the coming year. “Marketers seem to recognize that Google, Yahoo and Bing have become the front door for purchase decisions today, and that search engine presence is a key driver to getting their company’s fair share of sales,” Goldstein noted.
- Even in the face of complaints marketers hear about email fatigue, spending on email is predicted to maintain the same share of budget (7%) in 2011 that it occupied in 2010; 21% of marketers even plan to increase email spending in 2011.
- Quality trumped lead quantity in this year’s survey, one of the more dramatic changes seen from last year. While last year the need for greater lead volume outpaced improvements in lead quality as a top priority, that order was reversed this year.
For a copy of the results on 2011 Marketing Budget Best Practices, with results of the complete survey, contact Joel Goldstein, Goldstein Group Communications, at jgoldstein@ggcomm.com, or at 216-509-3119, or visit www.ggcomm.com.
Tags: Lead Quality, Marketing, Marketing Budgets Posted in Marketing |
December 2nd, 2010 by Cyndi Friedel
Congratulations to Goldstein Group client Radisphere, whose new web presence (www.radisphere.net) took top honors in the web category of the “eHealthcare Leadership Awards.” The new web site (can you guess which agency created the site?) is part of a total rebranding and name change effort for the company as it crafts a new identity and platform to appeal to the hospital market.
Tags: eHealthcare Leadership Awards, Goldstein Group Communications, Radisphere, www.radisphere.net Posted in Web Design |
November 23rd, 2010 by Mark Johnson
Trade magazines are applying new ways of thinking throughout their business, and that extends even to the tried-and-true press tour. On a recent agency tour through the electronics and manufacturing media, we met one group of editors who now call themselves “Content Managers.” We think that’s the right approach, as we’re all in the “content distribution” business today. An article we would have once written just for publication in a magazine now is destined to be re-purposed as content for a wide variety of end uses — as a webcast, a white paper, a blog post, even content directed to Wikipedia.
Other interesting changes: one editor took pictures of the presenters on his cell phone to post to the magazine’s Facebook page; another asked if the presentation could be recorded on video.
Tags: press tours, Social Media Posted in Social Media |
November 15th, 2010 by Joel Goldstein
It’s marketing budgeting time, the annual discussion we have with all of our clients. Our position has always been that it’s important to surround the “sweet spot” on all sides; in 2011, that remains an online and offline world.
In fact, last year, according to our annual study conducted jointly with Hearst Publishing, 56 percent of budgets were spent on traditional tools and 44 percent were spent online. What decisions are you making for the upcoming year? Share your insights with us, at goo.gl/h4A3.
Tags: Marketing Budgets, online advertising, online marketing Posted in Marketing |
November 11th, 2010 by Joel Goldstein
I attended a tremendous seminar on “Earning Trust” recently. Seminar speakers made the point that the past two years have been transformative for us as marketers, consumers and employees. The economic upheaval has certainly touched us all. But has it changed us?
In fact, I believe the past two years has presented us as marketers with what will become one of our biggest challenges – re-establishing and re-building trust. We’ve been hit with re-defining moments at every turn – the Great Recession, the Gulf oil spill, Wall Street financial/foreclosure crises, even the Cuyahoga County government scandals here at home. Are the cars we buy safe to drive? Is this new drug safe? Can I believe my CEO when he says our jobs are safe?
Simply put, trust is the front door for business. You can’t make a sale unless the consumer trusts your company and its products. And you can’t expect your employees to perform unless they trust the company to treat them right, and to treat their customers right.
While we intuitively feel that trust has taken a hit (we all have that sixth sense as effective marketers!), survey data bears this out. A study by Right Management in May, 2010 showed that only 20% of 4000 U. S. employees in the U. S. said they always trusted their managers to make the best decisions. Think about that. (The next time your CEO is about to give a speech to company employees, lean over and say, “Don’t be nervous. Remember, only one in five employees here today is likely to believe what you say!”)
Why does trust in the workplace matter? Forget soft concepts of altruism; let’s just look at financial payback. A 2010 survey of 211 companies by Interaction Associates found that companies in the top 10% of its Trust Index showed a price/earnings ratio 28.5% higher than those in the bottom 10%.
Going forward, this will be a time when employees and customers watch how companies and their leaders act as much as by what they say. And as marketers, it’s our charge, our mission, to lead this march. That’s tough duty, but since we’re the only ones at the table – not manufacturing, operations, finance, engineering — charged with the responsibility for listening, it’s our responsibility to make sure our executive leaders are truly hearing what customers and employees have to say. Honesty and authenticity will be key values driving business going forward, not just our usual value-proposition, features-and-benefits discussion. Is your organization up to those standards?
Tags: Goldstein Group Communications, Marketing Posted in Marketing |
November 9th, 2010 by Cyndi Friedel
Check out our latest eNewsletter for marketing news, ideas and tips at: http://www.ggcomm.com/BrandScan/Nov10/index.htm
Posted in Marketing |
October 18th, 2010 by Cyndi Friedel
When Abanaki developed its “Fuzzy” oil skimming material several years ago, it never dreamed it would prove so effective in what would become the biggest environmental disaster of our lifetimes – the Gulf Oil spill. But getting the message out about its Fuzzy material was important not only to capture attention of those coordinating Gulf cleanup, but for its traditional base of industrial customers that will buy oil skimmers long after the Gulf spill is out of the news. So a PR, video and Twitter campaign launched with Goldstein Group sought to generate not just coverage, but to drive traffic to the company’s site. During the campaign, Abanaki content almost took over relevant Google searches; a search on “gulf oil skimmer,” for instance, yielded Abanaki content, news releases and even a Twitter post that consumed 6 of the 10 page 1 Google listings. As a result, Abanaki drove its web traffic up 120% from April to June. And it wasn’t all casual surfers; during the same time, lead generation conversions (quote requests, lead forms, etc.) jumped 14%. The company’s Twitter followers more than doubled as well during the campaign.
Tags: PR, Social Media Posted in Search Engine Optimization |
October 14th, 2010 by Cyndi Friedel
When is a quote button invisible on a web page? The answer to that question came as part of a Goldstein Group web navigation study conducted at the start of a web re-design project for L. J. Star, a process control manufacturer. Because everyone has an opinion about what constitutes good web design, and because it really only matters what customers think, Goldstein Group launched a web navigation study to guide the structure of the new site’s design. By testing the customers’ ability to complete a series of 10 common tasks, searches and downloads, based on the most desired marketing “outcomes” of a web visit, the agency discovered a far more intuitive and logical navigation scheme to present to customers on the new site. The online interviews were recorded and captured for client review. Some surprises? The Request-a-Quote button’s position in the previous site design was overlooked by many, because of the Quote button’s location on the page. Another test to find a particular data sheet could only be completed 62% of the time.
Posted in Web Design |
September 27th, 2010 by Cyndi Friedel
It’s a beautiful desk, built of fine hardwoods and a contemporary design that makes it a perfect fit for a den, home office or workplace. But even more compelling, its sophisticated design hides ugly tangles of wires and cables caused by all the wireless routers, monitors and workstations that crowd a typical workspace. So Goldstein Group was hired by Caretta to create a new brand for the young furniture manufacturer as it moved from development to full-scale production. With new messaging, literature, a series of PR announcements and a re-imagined web presence, Caretta traffic doubled every month during the first four months following the company’s brand launch. Strong PR announcements and aggressive search engine marketing drove ever-higher web visits with metrics that showed visitors remained on the site for remarkably long periods.
Tags: Marketing, PPC, PR Posted in Marketing |
September 21st, 2010 by Joel Goldstein
Internet marketers often speak about processes being “frictionless,” of an ideal situation where sales are created quickly, smoothly and with none of the barriers traditionally facing marketers.
That’s certainly the ideal situation, one we all seek to achieve. Yet, we know from practical experience that it’s difficult to achieve, particularly in sales lead funnel management. In fact, lead flow for business-to-business companies is anything but frictionless today.
Consider the attached graphic that shows the steps for a typical multi-million manufacturer. It generates thousands of leads, sells through a direct sales force, and uses the traditional inside-outside sales support infrastructure where inside sales personnel qualify and support an outside sales team that pursues the highest quality leads. Very common and routine, yet you can see from the complexity of the chart that there are many steps a lead must pass through on its way from creation to close.
Every company contains a different chart. Whether yours matches what you see here is unimportant; what is important is that the process is involves multiple departments, multiple people and multiple steps, and making it perform efficiently must begin with someone actually plotting out the process to capture what actually takes place.
But now the hard work begins. How do you IMPROVE the process? How do you reduce complexity, cut the number of steps, improve the speed of lead flow and improve the communications that takes place (or doesn’t take place!)?
Our agency has identified nine common “breakpoints” that occur in most companies in some form in the lead chain. Improvement can’t begin until the process is documented, then diagnosed by uncovering the breakpoints common to your company. You may have all nine (unlikely) or a subset of the nine we’ve seen. You may have others not identified here. But the improvement process begins with identification, then understanding, then resolution of each breakpoint affecting your company.
Here is a summary of the nine breakpoints most common in lead generation today:
- Lead Flow. Do you have enough quality leads flowing through the system? Pretty basic, but you can’t achieve your company’s sales goals if you don’t know how many leads must enter the funnel. In other words, if your average sale is $10,000, your monthly sales target is $100,000, and you close one out of every 10 opportunities, your sales funnel has to generate 100 quality leads monthly in order to meet your sales projections. Conversely, it’s possible to have too many leads in the funnel, in situations where you don’t have enough staff to process/qualify them, or enough budget to allocate to lead processing (yes, there is a cost for handling every lead!).
- CRM/Technology. Customer Relationship Management software should provide a platform to answer all your questions about leads, and to eliminate friction from the process. We all know, however, that too many CRM installations fail, or that most companies don’t really use or absorb the technology in ways that help the sales process. CRM technology should be used to eliminate many of the breakpoints we’ll identify here. Hiring more people, generating more leads, accepting breakdowns in communications, are all unnecessary afflictions of the process that good CRM implementation can solve.
- Lead Quality/Lead Scoring. It’s important to understand what your close rate is (10%, 25%, etc.), and how to apply that to various people, product lines and divisions. Close rate is a magic number that diagnoses many types of breakpoints in the sales process. If different salespeople have different close rates, it points to training or perhaps territory issues. If close rates deteriorate over time, it points to problems with leads being generated that are low quality, or a change in the market taking place (a competitor’s new offering or lower price). If your funnel isn’t working well, it could be that the leads you’re entering into the system at the top are of low quality. Every lead needs to be “scored” as A, B or C quality in terms of its relationship to your sweet spot, your target: these are leads that close the fastest, have the highest profit margins and generate the most repeat business and referrals.
- Role Confusion. For organizations that have inside-outside sales teams, it must be clear what lead is sent to the high-priority outside salesperson (A leads), what leads require additional qualification/processing (B leads) and what leads should be sent just to the database and are too low quality (yet still relevant) today but may bubble up to B or A quality later. Some organizations send all leads to the field, which is typically a process that is inefficient and burns out a sales force. However your company does it, the process needs to be defined.
- Leads Sent to the Right Place. For organizations with distributors or outside sales reps, what leads go to these outside resources, and when? If you sell a complex product, you may not be able to send leads out to an independent rep until they’ve been further qualified. Or, your organization may rely on the reps to fulfill that task. Every process is different, requiring thought given to the question of just which team handles which leads at what point.
- Links to Outside Reps/Distributors. Whether it’s a dedicated online portal or some other method for tracking leads, it’s important to incorporate lead follow-up with any outside resources that receive leads in your funnel process.
- Feedback Link. You’ll want to build in a feedback loop into your lead process, likely through your CRM/technology system, to track quotes and opportunities. This type of data is important not only for ensuring that no opportunities are lost, but to improve the overall process and lead quality you’re generating.
- Separate Databases. Most companies maintain a lead and prospect database, often controlled by marketing or sales, and also a separate database for customers. These twin silos of unconnected data prevent marketing organizations from selling to existing customers (the lowest of the low-hanging fruit), generating referrals, and gaining insight into who becomes a customer and why. Combining the prospect and customer database is a simple tactic for creating powerful leverage that translates into immediate revenue and insight.
- Analysis/Metrics. Simply put, marketing is math. Everything about sales and marketing can be converted to numbers, analytics and measurement, and nothing can be improved until activities are converted into numbers. Diagnosing problems, improving the system, generating more quotes and conversions, reducing cost/lead – all these basic tasks we face as managers of sales and marketing can’t begin to be solved without understanding in numerical terms what’s taking place, and what can be done to remove the barriers that analytics reveal exist.
Tags: business-to-business, CRM, lead flow, Lead Quality, Leads Posted in Internet |
|
|