| |
Posts Tagged ‘Leads’
Lead Generation Only Works When You Call Them Back
Monday, August 15th, 2011
Marketing Automation would be a great thing, if only we could take the people out of the process! It seems that regardless of the tool, company, training regimen or industry, these valuable programs we’ve been installing for the past 20 years always are tripped up by human nature.
The most recent reminder of that was a June 2011 study by a b-to-b sales organization called InsideSales.com. In its review of the effectiveness of lead management systems, they found that 55.3 percent of the companies in its survey, 159 firms, NEVER RESPONDED to any web leads they generated. This is despite the fact that web leads tend to be the highest quality of any lead source companies typically generate.
Lead follow-up is never easy, and automated email response tools can simplify the process at least with a cursory response. But it’s shocking to see so many b-to-b companies completely disregard the money they’re spending pushing people to their websites in order to engage and generate a response – only to have those customer inquiries fall on deaf ears.
Tags: lead generation, Leads Posted in Marketing | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 19th, 2011
Another break in the lead-tracking chain has fallen! Marketers have sensed for some time that many inbound calls were actually preceded by a Google search or visit to the company’s web site. Now, we have the data to show it. Mongoose Metrics software, added to a site as easily as Google Analytics, is able to trace the source of incoming phone calls, so you’ll know if the call was made after receiving an e-newsletter or after a search. It will even tell you what search engine was used, and whether it was an organic or paid search result. In one instance, Mongoose showed us, for instance, that paid search on Yahoo! was more likely to lead to a phone call than Google paid search. Hmmm.
Tags: Leads, Mongoose Metrics Posted in Marketing | No Comments »
Tuesday, March 29th, 2011
It’s all about conversions. Handbook offers have long been the “home run” for b-to-b lead generation. But we took it up a notch when we re-directed the offer to a landing page created using industry “best practices”: just four fields to complete in the request form and no other links or navigation to distract the visitor. Of course, best practices applied here as well; lead flow from the handbook offer jumped 400% during the landing page’s first two months.
Tags: B-to-B, landing pages, Leads Posted in Marketing | No Comments »
Tuesday, September 21st, 2010
Internet marketers often speak about processes being “frictionless,” of an ideal situation where sales are created quickly, smoothly and with none of the barriers traditionally facing marketers.
That’s certainly the ideal situation, one we all seek to achieve. Yet, we know from practical experience that it’s difficult to achieve, particularly in sales lead funnel management. In fact, lead flow for business-to-business companies is anything but frictionless today.
Consider the attached graphic that shows the steps for a typical multi-million manufacturer. It generates thousands of leads, sells through a direct sales force, and uses the traditional inside-outside sales support infrastructure where inside sales personnel qualify and support an outside sales team that pursues the highest quality leads. Very common and routine, yet you can see from the complexity of the chart that there are many steps a lead must pass through on its way from creation to close.
Every company contains a different chart. Whether yours matches what you see here is unimportant; what is important is that the process is involves multiple departments, multiple people and multiple steps, and making it perform efficiently must begin with someone actually plotting out the process to capture what actually takes place.
But now the hard work begins. How do you IMPROVE the process? How do you reduce complexity, cut the number of steps, improve the speed of lead flow and improve the communications that takes place (or doesn’t take place!)?
Our agency has identified nine common “breakpoints” that occur in most companies in some form in the lead chain. Improvement can’t begin until the process is documented, then diagnosed by uncovering the breakpoints common to your company. You may have all nine (unlikely) or a subset of the nine we’ve seen. You may have others not identified here. But the improvement process begins with identification, then understanding, then resolution of each breakpoint affecting your company.
Here is a summary of the nine breakpoints most common in lead generation today:
- Lead Flow. Do you have enough quality leads flowing through the system? Pretty basic, but you can’t achieve your company’s sales goals if you don’t know how many leads must enter the funnel. In other words, if your average sale is $10,000, your monthly sales target is $100,000, and you close one out of every 10 opportunities, your sales funnel has to generate 100 quality leads monthly in order to meet your sales projections. Conversely, it’s possible to have too many leads in the funnel, in situations where you don’t have enough staff to process/qualify them, or enough budget to allocate to lead processing (yes, there is a cost for handling every lead!).
- CRM/Technology. Customer Relationship Management software should provide a platform to answer all your questions about leads, and to eliminate friction from the process. We all know, however, that too many CRM installations fail, or that most companies don’t really use or absorb the technology in ways that help the sales process. CRM technology should be used to eliminate many of the breakpoints we’ll identify here. Hiring more people, generating more leads, accepting breakdowns in communications, are all unnecessary afflictions of the process that good CRM implementation can solve.
- Lead Quality/Lead Scoring. It’s important to understand what your close rate is (10%, 25%, etc.), and how to apply that to various people, product lines and divisions. Close rate is a magic number that diagnoses many types of breakpoints in the sales process. If different salespeople have different close rates, it points to training or perhaps territory issues. If close rates deteriorate over time, it points to problems with leads being generated that are low quality, or a change in the market taking place (a competitor’s new offering or lower price). If your funnel isn’t working well, it could be that the leads you’re entering into the system at the top are of low quality. Every lead needs to be “scored” as A, B or C quality in terms of its relationship to your sweet spot, your target: these are leads that close the fastest, have the highest profit margins and generate the most repeat business and referrals.
- Role Confusion. For organizations that have inside-outside sales teams, it must be clear what lead is sent to the high-priority outside salesperson (A leads), what leads require additional qualification/processing (B leads) and what leads should be sent just to the database and are too low quality (yet still relevant) today but may bubble up to B or A quality later. Some organizations send all leads to the field, which is typically a process that is inefficient and burns out a sales force. However your company does it, the process needs to be defined.
- Leads Sent to the Right Place. For organizations with distributors or outside sales reps, what leads go to these outside resources, and when? If you sell a complex product, you may not be able to send leads out to an independent rep until they’ve been further qualified. Or, your organization may rely on the reps to fulfill that task. Every process is different, requiring thought given to the question of just which team handles which leads at what point.
- Links to Outside Reps/Distributors. Whether it’s a dedicated online portal or some other method for tracking leads, it’s important to incorporate lead follow-up with any outside resources that receive leads in your funnel process.
- Feedback Link. You’ll want to build in a feedback loop into your lead process, likely through your CRM/technology system, to track quotes and opportunities. This type of data is important not only for ensuring that no opportunities are lost, but to improve the overall process and lead quality you’re generating.
- Separate Databases. Most companies maintain a lead and prospect database, often controlled by marketing or sales, and also a separate database for customers. These twin silos of unconnected data prevent marketing organizations from selling to existing customers (the lowest of the low-hanging fruit), generating referrals, and gaining insight into who becomes a customer and why. Combining the prospect and customer database is a simple tactic for creating powerful leverage that translates into immediate revenue and insight.
- Analysis/Metrics. Simply put, marketing is math. Everything about sales and marketing can be converted to numbers, analytics and measurement, and nothing can be improved until activities are converted into numbers. Diagnosing problems, improving the system, generating more quotes and conversions, reducing cost/lead – all these basic tasks we face as managers of sales and marketing can’t begin to be solved without understanding in numerical terms what’s taking place, and what can be done to remove the barriers that analytics reveal exist.
Tags: business-to-business, CRM, lead flow, Lead Quality, Leads Posted in Internet | No Comments »
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010
Tags: Leads, Marketing Posted in Marketing | No Comments »
|
|